What we have changed our minds about: Part 1. Borderline personality disorder as a limitation of resilience
Adolescent friendships predict later resilient functioning across psychosocial domains in a healthy community cohort
Effects of economic downturns on child mortality: a global economic analysis, 1981–2010
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document
Patient Experiences of Swallowing Exercises After Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study Examining Barriers and Facilitators Using Behaviour Change Theory
The value of theory in programmes to implement clinical guidelines: Insights from a retrospective mixed-methods evaluation of a programme to increase adherence to national guidelines for chronic disease in primary care
Involving patients and the public in writing academic papers
Proving that there is always value in involving patients and the public in research, however complex and technical the topic may be, the CLAHRC’s lay document reviewers have been acknowledged in a prestigious British Medical Journal paper.
CLAHRC patient and public partners who make up our “virtual” panel of reviewers were involved in producing an academic paper published in the prestigious journal – the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement.
In order to improve the way studies are reported in journals, researchers developed a checklist to include all the information an author needs to report in order to make sure that readers are clear on:
- how the research was done
- how the results were analysed
- what the results might mean for treating conditions or health services
Researchers at the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research developed the STARI checklist to help researchers report implementation studies – studies that develop strategies to implement interventions that have been shown to be effective but which are not yet part of routine practice.
This was described as a “difficult” request for patient and public involvement by researchers due to the complexity of the material.
Our reviewers were asked to rate the paper under a number of headings including
- the importance of the topic
- the papers potential to impact patient care
- how easy the check-list would be for researchers to use
- how easy the paper was to read and follow
The reviewers feedback on the draft was “very helpful” and they were duly acknowledged in the final publication which we believe sets a good precedent for future PPI in writing academic papers.
Full paper details
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement